<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: T-Rep 2 Preview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bothacker.com/2010/02/28/t-rep-2-preview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bothacker.com/2010/02/28/t-rep-2-preview/</link>
	<description>Robotics, RepRap, and other Mechanalia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:41:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Wynne</title>
		<link>http://bothacker.com/2010/02/28/t-rep-2-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-731</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Wynne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 01:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bothacker.com/?p=239#comment-731</guid>
		<description>Hi. Very impressed. I&#039;m currently building a 40W CO2 laser cutter using TSlot and was looking to use it to build a 3D printer. I&#039;m impressed at the simplicity of the design and the degree to which you used the TSlot in the design.

Do you have any information about the design that you can distribute? I&#039;m going to start modelling a design (with yours as inspiration), however instead of using flow jet parts I&#039;m going to use laser cut acrylic. Do you see any problems with this?

Thanks, Ben</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. Very impressed. I&#8217;m currently building a 40W CO2 laser cutter using TSlot and was looking to use it to build a 3D printer. I&#8217;m impressed at the simplicity of the design and the degree to which you used the TSlot in the design.</p>
<p>Do you have any information about the design that you can distribute? I&#8217;m going to start modelling a design (with yours as inspiration), however instead of using flow jet parts I&#8217;m going to use laser cut acrylic. Do you see any problems with this?</p>
<p>Thanks, Ben</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eoghan</title>
		<link>http://bothacker.com/2010/02/28/t-rep-2-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-696</link>
		<dc:creator>Eoghan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 00:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bothacker.com/?p=239#comment-696</guid>
		<description>Very nice work. I like the professional finish and industrial styling of your design. I would say that it I prefer it to the mendel reprap design personally as i am not all that interested in the self replication concept. May i suggest the possibility of including a removable sliding panel for the front of the machine that could be used to fully enclose the machine whilst printing especially considering you wish to explore the space heated option. Best of luck with your continued development and i hope you soon release plans and/or kits for this design</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice work. I like the professional finish and industrial styling of your design. I would say that it I prefer it to the mendel reprap design personally as i am not all that interested in the self replication concept. May i suggest the possibility of including a removable sliding panel for the front of the machine that could be used to fully enclose the machine whilst printing especially considering you wish to explore the space heated option. Best of luck with your continued development and i hope you soon release plans and/or kits for this design</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://bothacker.com/2010/02/28/t-rep-2-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-509</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bothacker.com/?p=239#comment-509</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m impressed!  Your video of the first model seems to show a great combination of accuracy and speed.  How is the 2nd version progressing?  I&#039;d like to see how your versions compare to the Mendel, RapMan, MakerBot, etc... I&#039;m thinking of building my own unit and want to choose the one that will build the best quality parts since doing so allows you to build even better units later with those parts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m impressed!  Your video of the first model seems to show a great combination of accuracy and speed.  How is the 2nd version progressing?  I&#8217;d like to see how your versions compare to the Mendel, RapMan, MakerBot, etc&#8230; I&#8217;m thinking of building my own unit and want to choose the one that will build the best quality parts since doing so allows you to build even better units later with those parts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brianorca</title>
		<link>http://bothacker.com/2010/02/28/t-rep-2-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-491</link>
		<dc:creator>Brianorca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 05:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bothacker.com/?p=239#comment-491</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just finishing construction of my own t-slot repstrap. (See link) I didn&#039;t realize 80/20 did custom cutting! Might have save me some headache. Still, I was able to get everything machined with my hand tools. 

I wonder if you could get some more build height if you allowed the extruder to extend above the top of the X axis hardware. It seems the top &amp; bottom rails don&#039;t need to be that far apart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just finishing construction of my own t-slot repstrap. (See link) I didn&#8217;t realize 80/20 did custom cutting! Might have save me some headache. Still, I was able to get everything machined with my hand tools. </p>
<p>I wonder if you could get some more build height if you allowed the extruder to extend above the top of the X axis hardware. It seems the top &amp; bottom rails don&#8217;t need to be that far apart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://bothacker.com/2010/02/28/t-rep-2-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-433</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 05:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bothacker.com/?p=239#comment-433</guid>
		<description>Hi,

just came across  your site. I really like the idea of using professional cut aluminium extrusions and flat parts. Will use aluminium extrusions for my DIY streetview project.

I am looking to get a app. 6x6x6 inch part printed. Seems this is to large for a lot of the machines I saw.

A design question: 
I don&#039;t understand why people go for a movable table? The machine needs to be at least twice the size compared to a machine with movable head only.
Moving the head in x, y and z direction seems to be the choice for a compact design?

I do understand that stacking 3 axles &quot;ontop&quot; of each other is very demanding. Maybe have the z axle on the table?

Thanks,
Jan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>just came across  your site. I really like the idea of using professional cut aluminium extrusions and flat parts. Will use aluminium extrusions for my DIY streetview project.</p>
<p>I am looking to get a app. 6x6x6 inch part printed. Seems this is to large for a lot of the machines I saw.</p>
<p>A design question:<br />
I don&#8217;t understand why people go for a movable table? The machine needs to be at least twice the size compared to a machine with movable head only.<br />
Moving the head in x, y and z direction seems to be the choice for a compact design?</p>
<p>I do understand that stacking 3 axles &#8220;ontop&#8221; of each other is very demanding. Maybe have the z axle on the table?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Jan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aka47</title>
		<link>http://bothacker.com/2010/02/28/t-rep-2-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator>aka47</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 08:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bothacker.com/?p=239#comment-430</guid>
		<description>BTW forgot to mention, it looks cool, well done</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW forgot to mention, it looks cool, well done</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aka47</title>
		<link>http://bothacker.com/2010/02/28/t-rep-2-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>aka47</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 08:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bothacker.com/?p=239#comment-429</guid>
		<description>I like aluminium extrusion, always have done.

I apreciate you are heading towards more profesional looking production machine with the design.

As a side design you would&#039;nt consider a T slot minimalist repstrap along McWire lines would you ??

I think there is a demand for a McWire T Slot Kit to get many folk started.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like aluminium extrusion, always have done.</p>
<p>I apreciate you are heading towards more profesional looking production machine with the design.</p>
<p>As a side design you would&#8217;nt consider a T slot minimalist repstrap along McWire lines would you ??</p>
<p>I think there is a demand for a McWire T Slot Kit to get many folk started.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://bothacker.com/2010/02/28/t-rep-2-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 02:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bothacker.com/?p=239#comment-427</guid>
		<description>Trevor: Thanks for all your kind words!

The machine is designed to require almost no machining/drilling/rework of any kind.  All the heavy machining and cutting is done by 80/20.  And since the flat parts are cut by waterjet, you basically have a box of parts you bolt together.  Now, there are some holes that I ream to the tolerances I&#039;m looking for, and a few holes to tap.  But other than that, it is a really simple project to assemble.

If you want to buy the raw extrusion and do the cutting &amp; light milling yourself, that can definitely be done in a garage, and probably with handtools.  Personally, after I saw how nice the machined parts from 80/20 were, and how reasonably priced, I gave up doing it myself.

As for using the waterjet, I use it because it is available locally, and reasonably priced.  The flat parts can be cut using any method that can cut 1/8&quot; aluminum to +/- 0.005&quot;.  A cnc mill would work really well.  In fact, I&#039;d love to try this - I could probably eliminate the reaming step.   Can someone recommend a contract CNC shop?

As for kits/cost, I&#039;m presently considering my options.  I&#039;ll post something soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trevor: Thanks for all your kind words!</p>
<p>The machine is designed to require almost no machining/drilling/rework of any kind.  All the heavy machining and cutting is done by 80/20.  And since the flat parts are cut by waterjet, you basically have a box of parts you bolt together.  Now, there are some holes that I ream to the tolerances I&#8217;m looking for, and a few holes to tap.  But other than that, it is a really simple project to assemble.</p>
<p>If you want to buy the raw extrusion and do the cutting &#038; light milling yourself, that can definitely be done in a garage, and probably with handtools.  Personally, after I saw how nice the machined parts from 80/20 were, and how reasonably priced, I gave up doing it myself.</p>
<p>As for using the waterjet, I use it because it is available locally, and reasonably priced.  The flat parts can be cut using any method that can cut 1/8&#8243; aluminum to +/- 0.005&#8243;.  A cnc mill would work really well.  In fact, I&#8217;d love to try this &#8211; I could probably eliminate the reaming step.   Can someone recommend a contract CNC shop?</p>
<p>As for kits/cost, I&#8217;m presently considering my options.  I&#8217;ll post something soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://bothacker.com/2010/02/28/t-rep-2-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 02:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bothacker.com/?p=239#comment-426</guid>
		<description>linefeed: Excellent point.

I actually chose the forward location for the z-axis threaded rod to place it close to where I&#039;m guessing the x-axis CG is.   Keep in mind that there will be an extruder hanging on the forward face, with a nice iron stepper motor.  :)

But yea, until I actually have an extruder designed and mounted, I won&#039;t know where the CG is.  It is definitely worth considering how some adjustability could be incorporated in the rod mounts to balance the axis.

Or perhaps I should just rotate the the x-axis horizontal, Mendel style, and put the extruder between the supports.  Hmm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>linefeed: Excellent point.</p>
<p>I actually chose the forward location for the z-axis threaded rod to place it close to where I&#8217;m guessing the x-axis CG is.   Keep in mind that there will be an extruder hanging on the forward face, with a nice iron stepper motor.  <img src='http://bothacker.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But yea, until I actually have an extruder designed and mounted, I won&#8217;t know where the CG is.  It is definitely worth considering how some adjustability could be incorporated in the rod mounts to balance the axis.</p>
<p>Or perhaps I should just rotate the the x-axis horizontal, Mendel style, and put the extruder between the supports.  Hmm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: linefeed</title>
		<link>http://bothacker.com/2010/02/28/t-rep-2-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>linefeed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 01:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bothacker.com/?p=239#comment-425</guid>
		<description>looks spiffy! ;)

that z drive threaded rod should probably aim for the center of gravity of the x axis assembly

which size profiles are you using?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks spiffy! <img src='http://bothacker.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>that z drive threaded rod should probably aim for the center of gravity of the x axis assembly</p>
<p>which size profiles are you using?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

